McKinsey Solve 85 vs 95 Minutes: What Your Invitation Tells You
If your McKinsey Solve invitation says 95 minutes, you're getting the new, longer Sustainable Futures Lab. McKinsey has increased the SFL from 20 to 30 minutes and rebuilt it around running a small research team rather than a chain of linked questions. Your invitation's stated length tells you which version you'll sit. Here's how the three lengths map:
| Your invitation says | Games | Sustainable Futures Lab |
|---|---|---|
| About 65 minutes | Red Rock Study (35 min) + Sea Wolf Game (30 min) | Not included |
| About 85 minutes | Red Rock Study + Sea Wolf Game + Sustainable Futures Lab | Standard version, 20 minutes |
| About 95 minutes (since late August 2026) | Red Rock Study + Sea Wolf Game + Sustainable Futures Lab | Team-management version, 30 minutes |
Both versions are running side by side. Candidates were still reporting 85-minute invitations with the 20-minute SFL in late September 2026, a month after the first 95-minute invitations, so the 30-minute version appears to be in pilot. That fits how McKinsey rolls out changes: it has said it pilots new versions of Solve on live applicants. Check your invitation and prepare for the version it names.
What candidates describe in the 30-minute Sustainable Futures Lab
Here's what candidates describe. We went through the public consulting forums we could access for August 1 to September 25, 2026, and found four candidate posts that bear on the new format:
- Two candidates whose invitations said 95 minutes. The first posted on August 24.
- One who says the new SFL "lasts 30 minutes" and has "a much more complex interface".
- One who describes the scenario itself: an island, four researchers and four workstations, played across an onboarding stage and then Day 1, Day 2 and Day 3.
That last account, from a candidate who sat it, is the only first-hand description of the mechanics we can find. So: three simulated days, four researchers, four workstations. That comes from one candidate, and it matches what prep sites tracking the format describe. The same candidate found the instructions hard to follow ("all text rather than hands-on like the other 2 games") and got a survey of about 20 questions afterwards, focused on the new SFL.
Prep sites add two more mechanics: what you decide and learn carries forward from one day to the next, and the board reshuffles each morning, so yesterday's placements don't simply stand. Both are plausible. Neither appears in any candidate account we've found yet, so we're not presenting them as reported. If you've sat the 95-minute version and can confirm or correct either one, tell us at info@solveprep.com. Verified corrections get logged with a date.
The standard SFL is a different animal: about 13 linked questions in 20 minutes, starting with a priority ranking, all on-screen text. In the one detailed account of the new version, it plays out with a four-person team over three simulated days.
What McKinsey has said about the new version
McKinsey confirms a new version of Solve is in pilot (McKinsey, July 2025). It hasn't published a name, mechanics or scoring for it. Its official Solve FAQ says only that "the length of your Solve assessment is outlined in your invitation email" (McKinsey's Solve FAQ). That's why the invitation is the signal to read.
Is 'Lab Leader' the official name for the new Sustainable Futures Lab?
No. McKinsey has not published a name for the 30-minute version of the Sustainable Futures Lab; its invitations and FAQs describe the assessment only by duration. 'Lab Leader' was coined in September 2026 by a third-party prep site as the label for its own simulator of the format. On this page we call it the 95-minute Sustainable Futures Lab, or the team-management version, because that's what candidates describe: an invitation stating 95 minutes, and a scenario in which they lead a four-person research team over three simulated days. If you've seen 'Lab Leader' elsewhere, it refers to the same thing.
How to prepare for the 85- and 95-minute Solve
65 minutes. Two games, and no one has reported a change to either in any version. Put your hours into the Red Rock Study and the Sea Wolf Game; the full prep guide covers both games.
85 minutes. Add the standard SFL: a priority ranking, then linked team decisions, in 20 minutes (how the standard Sustainable Futures Lab works). The part candidates underestimate is consistency. In our State of Solve study, SFL candidates on our simulator lose 60.7% of the available consistency points (95% CI 59.4–62.0). That's the worst-performed component anywhere in our Solve data. Judging one scenario well is the easy part. Holding a line across all of them is where points go.
95 minutes. Red Rock and Sea Wolf, same as above, then the 30-minute SFL. Prepare for that version specifically, not the 20-minute one:
- Budget the clock. 30 minutes across the three simulated days candidates describe is roughly ten minutes a day, less whatever onboarding takes.
- Read the instructions once, slowly. The candidate who described the scenario found them all text. If that holds, don't expect the game to teach you by doing.
- Track each researcher as you go. In a multi-day game, "who was struggling yesterday" is exactly the kind of thing memory drops under time pressure.
- Practice the version you're invited to. Our SFL simulator has a switch between the 20- and 30-minute versions, so your practice runs match your invitation. Get fluent with the daily loop and the clock before test day.
Where SolvePrep stands: our updated Sustainable Futures Lab simulator runs both versions. Flip the switch between the 20-minute and the 30-minute version, so you practice for the test you're actually invited to (timed practice on both SFL versions). As with every Solve game, McKinsey doesn't publish its scoring, so our scores are a training model, not McKinsey's. Every change we make goes on our dated What's New log.
You can also practice all three Solve games on the clock.

Free account, no card
McKinsey Solve 95 minutes: FAQ
Which version of the Solve will I get?
Whichever one your invitation's length points to. You don't choose it, and there's no reported way to ask for one or the other. A 65-minute invitation has no SFL, an 85-minute one has the standard SFL, and a 95-minute one has the 30-minute team-management version.
Is the 85-minute version being retired?
Not yet. Candidates were still reporting 85-minute invitations with the 20-minute SFL in late September 2026, a month after the first 95-minute invitations, so the 30-minute version appears to be in pilot alongside the standard one. McKinsey hasn't said when, or whether, the 20-minute version will be retired.
How long is the new Sustainable Futures Lab?
30 minutes, up from 20. That's why the invitation grows from 85 to 95 minutes: Red Rock Study 35, Sea Wolf Game 30, Sustainable Futures Lab 30.
Is the new Sustainable Futures Lab scored?
Assume it is. McKinsey publishes no scoring model for any Solve game. One candidate got a feedback survey about the new SFL afterwards and wondered whether it was a trial. Nobody outside McKinsey knows how it's weighted, so prepare as if it counts.
Does SolvePrep simulate the 95-minute version?
Yes. Our updated Sustainable Futures Lab simulator runs both versions: flip the switch between the 20-minute and the 30-minute version to practice for the test you're actually invited to. Red Rock and Sea Wolf are included too. McKinsey doesn't publish its scoring, so our scores are a training model, not McKinsey's.
Written by Tom Prescott, founder of SolvePrep. Last reviewed: September 25, 2026.